🛍️ 更多精选好物 ›
📊 公开数据一览
| 📦 榜单安装量 | 9.2K |
| ⭐ GitHub Stars | 969(fork 104) |
| 🗓️ 最近推送 | 2026-04-11 |
| 🌱 项目创建 | 2025-11-04 |
| 💻 语言 / License | Python · 未标注 |
| 🐛 开放Issue | 8 |
📝 工具简介
企业级深度研究skill,8阶段pipeline加来源可信度评分和自动验证,质量超越OpenAI、Gemini和Claude Desktop。
📖 怎么用
基本功能零依赖,直接 `git clone https://github.com/199-biotechnologies/claude-deep-research-skill.git ~/.claude/skills/deep-research` 装好。想用多源搜索就 `brew tap 199-biotechnologies/tap && brew install search-cli`,然后 `search config set keys.brave YOUR_KEY` 配个 key。用的时候直接说 "deep research on the current state of quantum computing" 跑标准模式,或者加 `in ultradeep mode` 跑深度模式,比如 "deep research in ultradeep mode: compare PostgreSQL vs Supabase for our stack"。
📋 迷你测评
企业级深度研究skill,8阶段pipeline加来源评分和自动验证。亮点是质量对标大厂产品,可信度有保障。适合做严肃调研,但上手可能有点重。
📄 README 要点
这是给 Claude Code 用的企业级深度研究引擎,能自动生成带引用来源的研究报告。核心功能包括来源可信度评分、多搜索引擎聚合和自动验证,不需要额外依赖就能跑基础功能。如果想聚合 Brave、Serper、Exa 这些搜索源,可以装个可选搜索命令行工具。它提供四种研究模式,从快速初步探索到超深度全面报告,耗时从几分钟到四十多分钟不等。工作流程是规划、检索、三角验证、提纲优化、综合、批判性审查再循环打磨,最后打包输出。适合需要严谨调研报告的场景,比如复杂课题研究或关键决策前的信息收集。
查看英文原文
Deep Research Skill for Claude Code Enterprise grade research engine for Claude Code. Produces citation backed reports with source credibility scoring, multi provider search, and automated validation. Installation [安装/使用命令见下方] No additional dependencies required for basic usage. Optional: search cli (multi provider search) For aggregated search across Brave, Serper, Exa, Jina, and Firecrawl: [安装/使用命令见下方] Usage [安装/使用命令见下方] [安装/使用命令见下方] Research Modes Mode Phases Duration Best For Quick 3 2 5 min Initial exploration Standard 6 5 10 min Most research questions Deep 8 10 20 min Complex topics, critical decisions UltraDeep 8+ 20 45 min Comprehensive reports, maximum rigor Pipeline Scope → Plan → Retrieve (parallel search + agents) → Triangulate → Outline Refinement → Synthesize → Critique (with loop back) → Refine → Package Key features: Step 0 : Retrieves current date before searches (prevents stale training data year assumptions) Parallel retrieval : 5 10 concurrent searches + 2 3 focused sub agents returning structured evidence objects First Finish Search : Adaptive quality thresholds by mode Critique loop back : Phase 6 can return to Phase 3 with delta queries if critical gaps found Multi persona red teaming : Skeptical Practitioner, Adversarial Reviewer, Implementation Engineer (Deep/UltraDeep) Disk persisted citations : sources.json survives context compaction and continuation agents Output Reports saved to /Documents/[Topic] Research [Date]/ : Markdown (primary source of truth) HTML (McKinsey style, auto opened in browser) PDF (professional print via WeasyPrint) Reports 18K words auto continue via recursive agent spawning with context preservation. Quality Standards 10+ sources, 3+ per major claim Executive summary 200 400 words Findings 600 2,000 words each, prose first ( =80%) Full bibliography with URLs, no placeholders Automated validation: validate report.py (9 checks) + verify citations.py (DOI/URL/hallucination detec
💬 评论(0)
交流使用体验、避坑建议;违规内容将被删除